"non" is a great descriptor. It's intuitive, terse, and it oozes utter disdain for those it describes. Imagine being so disdainful of a group you can't be bothered uttering more than one syllable or typing a few characters.
I'm afraid it's sort of retarded. There are basically Northern Eurasians, who are full humans, then the more southerly Wogs: Jeets and such, then waaay down in pre-human evolution, Africans.
Conflating Northeast Asians with African pre-humans is dangerously wrong.
It seems 'retarded' to you because you're anti-White and want to maintain friction between Whites to no benefit at all. The Great Divide is between the pan-European people's and non-Europeans. Everything else is trivial.
I thought I made it clear that Yockey was there first.
"non" is a great descriptor. It's intuitive, terse, and it oozes utter disdain for those it describes. Imagine being so disdainful of a group you can't be bothered uttering more than one syllable or typing a few characters.
well sure "nons" will likely be better accepted as a descriptor in 2026
but we must give credit to Yockey for leading the way in utilizing these one word descriptors
can we agree that nons or guks have no business in WN pontfificating to us what we should believe and who we should support?
I'm afraid it's sort of retarded. There are basically Northern Eurasians, who are full humans, then the more southerly Wogs: Jeets and such, then waaay down in pre-human evolution, Africans.
Conflating Northeast Asians with African pre-humans is dangerously wrong.
It seems 'retarded' to you because you're anti-White and want to maintain friction between Whites to no benefit at all. The Great Divide is between the pan-European people's and non-Europeans. Everything else is trivial.